Elon Musk has long cast himself as a champion of clean technology – from electric cars (Tesla) to reusable rockets (SpaceX) and solar power (SolarCity). In tweets and speeches, he often emphasizes climate action. For example, he has called climate change “real” and warned that “we must move towards renewable energy” or risk “running out of energy and dying.”
He has dubbed himself “super pro-climate,” called global warming “a major risk,” and even boasted that he has done “more for the environment than any single human on Earth”. At the same time, Musk’s tone on climate has shifted: in 2024, he quipped that climate change is “real, just much slower than alarmists claim”, a statement critics say downplays the urgency of global warming.
He once urged a “popular uprising” against the fossil fuel industry, warning the world was “unavoidably headed toward some level of harm” without action, but now often stresses market solutions instead of regulation. In public forums, Musk repeatedly advocates a carbon tax to reduce emissions: on Joe Rogan, he said, “My top recommendation…would be just add a carbon tax”, and in 2024 he tweeted that “the only action needed to solve climate change is a carbon tax”.
He contrasts this with his criticism of subsidies: he told Tesla investors he favors taxing “the bad” (like CO₂) while cutting other taxes, and even celebrated moves to rescind EV tax credits as beneficial to Tesla. These public statements mix clear support for renewables with skepticism about government mandates, highlighting Musk’s view that market-driven innovations (not heavy regulation) are the best path to a cleaner future.
Tesla and electrifying transportation
Musk’s Tesla has been a driving force for electric vehicles (EVs), a key element in cutting transportation emissions. The company’s mission is “to accelerate the advent of sustainable transport by bringing compelling mass-market electric cars to market as soon as possible”.
Tesla’s vehicles produce no tailpipe pollution and, by many analyses, have lower lifetime greenhouse gas emissions than comparable gasoline cars (even accounting for battery production). In numbers: Tesla reports that its EVs helped customers avoid roughly 8.4 million metric tons of CO₂ in 2021 (other estimates quote approximately 10-20 million tons avoided in 2023).
Tesla has captured about half of US EV sales, spurring both consumer adoption and competition from legacy automakers. Musk has used Tesla’s success to push others into EVs – he has publicly prodded the auto industry to make more electric models and even cheered when other manufacturers lagged behind, arguing that “the industry was operating under two false premises” – namely that electric cars weren’t viable or desirable.
What Tesla critics have to say
That said, critics note that Tesla’s impact is also tied to government policy. Tesla has earned billions selling emissions credits to rival automakers, essentially converting cleaner performance into profit. Musk has even framed the removal of EV incentives as favorable to Tesla’s business: he tweeted in 2024 that taking away federal EV tax credits would “only help Tesla” (since Tesla’s high-profit sales could weather weaker demand better than its competitors).
Federal rollback of emissions rules could reduce the need for such credits, potentially cutting Tesla’s credit revenue (for context, Tesla earned about $2.7 billion in selling credits in 2023). In short, Tesla is lauded for lowering auto emissions at scale, but observers also point out that its gains so far come from a mix of innovation and favorable policies – and that its leader’s shift toward deregulation (endorsing a Trump agenda that would weaken pollution rules) has unsettled some environmentally minded customers.
SpaceX: rockets and sustainability
SpaceX aims to revolutionize space travel with large reusable rockets – an approach that can have environmental upsides. Reusing booster rockets (like SpaceX’s Falcon 9) avoids building new rockets from scratch each time. Estimates suggest reuse can cut per-launch carbon emissions significantly. SpaceX itself claims reusing stages reduces launch emissions by ~30% compared to expendable rockets. In this sense, Musk’s push for reusability is more sustainable than the “throw-away” rockets of the past.
However, the environmental footprint of rocket launches remains a concern. Currently, space launches account for only a tiny fraction of global emissions – on the order of 1-2% of aviation’s carbon footprint, and aviation itself is about 2-3% of global CO₂. But launch activity is growing fast.
SpaceX’s orbital missions
In 2023, SpaceX alone launched a record 96 orbital missions (out of about 223 worldwide) and aims for around 150 in 2024. Some scientists warn that if launch rates (especially of the massive Starship vehicle) scale up as planned, the cumulative CO₂ and high-altitude pollutants (water vapor, soot from rocket plumes) could become significant.
A notable point: SpaceX’s Starship uses liquid methane/oxygen fuel, which produces CO₂ and water vapor (and some soot) on each launch. Although methane is cleaner-burning than older rocket fuels, it still adds greenhouse gases and contrails to the upper atmosphere. “We are in a climate crisis… and here we go, creating a massive launcher which is going to just add more carbon dioxide,” one researcher observed about Starship’s future launches.
Local environmental issues have also surfaced around SpaceX’s Texas launch site. SpaceX built Starship launch pads near sensitive wetlands and a wildlife refuge. The company uses a water deluge system (almost 180,000 gallons per launch) to cool the pad, but regulators found that tens of thousands of gallons were ending up in nearby marshes.
SpaceX fines
In 2024, both the U.S. EPA and Texas environmental authorities fined SpaceX (over $150,000 total) for violating the Clean Water Act. Conservationists report that recent Starship test flights have already destroyed shorebird nesting sites. Local groups and tribes have sued for a thorough environmental review, concerned that rockets may irreparably damage Texas coastal habitats.
Musk’s own words reflect this tension: he often frames his space projects as protecting life by colonizing other planets. At a 2022 event, he said, “We are life’s stewards… The creatures that we love… can’t build spaceships, but we can, and we can bring them with us.” In Musk’s vision, Starship is an “ark” for Earth’s flora and fauna if disasters strike.
But critics counter that the very launches meant to safeguard life on Mars are harming ecosystems on Earth today. In sum, SpaceX’s sustainability narrative (rocket reuse, satellite deorbiting, etc.) is partly offset by the growing emissions and habitat impacts of frequent launches.
Solar energy advocacy (SolarCity/Tesla Energy)
From the start, Musk has insisted that solar power must be part of the solution. He famously quipped that refusing to switch to renewables means “we will run out of energy and die”. Musk was chairman of SolarCity (founded by his cousins) and pushed in 2016 for Tesla to acquire the solar installer, aiming to create a vertically integrated clean energy company combining cars, batteries, and solar panels.
The idea was a “Tesla of energy,” with solar rooftops charging Tesla Powerwalls and EVs, blurring production and consumption of renewable energy. After the acquisition, SolarCity’s technology became Tesla Energy’s products: solar panels, Solar Roof tiles, and home batteries.
SolarCity had been the nation’s largest residential solar installer by 2015. In the early years, it helped drive down the costs of rooftop solar leases and popularize solar PPAs (agreements where homeowners pay for power rather than panels). Musk argued at the time that adding solar to Tesla’s lineup would help accelerate a zero-emissions economy by tackling stationary power as well as cars. In practice, however, Tesla’s solar business has not grown as explosively as its EV sales.
Solar installations have plateaued and even declined in recent quarters (by late 2023, Tesla was no longer reporting solar shipment numbers). Most industry analysts note that Tesla’s far larger impact on emissions comes from its cars and batteries; its rooftop solar is now a much smaller piece of Tesla’s revenue. Tesla CEO Elon Musk recently remarked that he’s “not sure how important solar is” relative to other parts of the business, reflecting that automotive and data center backup power (Powerpacks) have taken priority.
Controversies
SolarCity also drew controversy. Shareholders sued Musk over the Tesla acquisition, calling it a bailout for his relatives (SolarCity’s founders) and questioning whether the deal misled investors. Indeed, SolarCity had struggled financially before the merger, going so far as to offer “solar bonds” to raise capital and falling behind on profitability.
Tesla inherited these problems and had to spend years streamlining and integrating the solar business. Today Tesla’s solar products (including its futuristic Solar Roof tiles) still face stiff competition and have been described as slow to market.
Critics point out that Musk’s narrative of a full clean-energy ecosystem has thus been only partly realized: Tesla’s energy division is growing, but in absolute terms, its solar output remains modest. On the plus side, Tesla’s Powerwall home battery has been extremely popular, helping homes use solar electricity more efficiently. So while Musk’s advocacy for solar power is unquestioned, the actual results are mixed – strong in technology development (panels and batteries) but more limited in market penetration.
Carbon taxes, subsidies, and government policy
Musk often stresses market mechanisms over government mandates in climate policy. He publicly champions carbon pricing: Musk said a proper (revenue-neutral) tax on carbon would automatically steer the industry toward greener energy, comparing it to how cigarettes and alcohol are taxed more heavily than other goods.
He has consistently argued against industry subsidies as wasteful, tweeting in 2013 that he favors a “tax on the bad” rather than subsidies on the good. His criticism of subsidies is evident in his social media: in 2024, he celebrated U.S. proposals to remove EV tax credits, bluntly writing that pulling those incentives “will only help Tesla” by weakening competitors.
Economists, however, note that Musk’s simplistic slogan (“only a carbon tax is needed”) omits key details. For example, appropriate carbon taxes must be set at a high level to drive big emissions cuts, and governments may still need to fund clean-tech R&D or manage a just transition. A Cato Institute analysis of Musk’s tweet warned that his one-liner ignores political and technical challenges in designing a carbon tax. Nonetheless, Musk’s basic position remains that pricing CO₂ and deregulating markets will solve climate change faster than top-down mandates.
His stance on international policy
On international climate policy, Musk broke with the Trump administration in 2017 by resigning his White House advisory role when the U.S. withdrew from the Paris Agreement. He tweeted flatly that “climate change is real” and that quitting his council was needed because “leaving Paris is not good for America or the world.” This marked Musk as aligned with climate science at the time. Yet by 2024, he had become an adviser to the Republican Trump campaign, and science advisers note that he no longer actively emphasizes the climate in public comments.
He was reportedly not invited to a Biden EV summit in 2021, which some speculate soured his stance with the administration. By 2024, he had shifted toward the Republican side, publicly criticizing parts of the Biden climate agenda and later lending major support to the Trump 2024 campaign. These actions signal his hand in shaping, or at least responding to, U.S. climate policy debates.
Internationally, he wields clout through Tesla’s global footprint. In China, Tesla’s vast Gigafactory was built with Beijing’s blessing, and his strong support of Chinese EV policies is seen as a tacit endorsement of that country’s green transition. In Europe, Tesla’s presence factors into EU carbon rules. Influencemap, a climate-advocacy research group, recently scored Tesla as the leading automaker in global climate lobbying.
In 2023-24, Tesla submitted comments supporting tougher vehicle-emission standards in places like Australia, New Zealand, the U.S., Canada, and the UK. That is unusual: many auto-makers and trade associations actually fight such rules. Musk’s company, by contrast, has publicly lobbied for stronger GHG targets and zero-emissions mandates, leveraging its EV specialization.
Overall, Musk’s policy stance on climate change is a blend: he preaches a (market-friendly) carbon tax and professes support for the Paris goals, but he also opposes many climate regulations and subsidies that he calls inefficient. This fits his broader narrative of innovation-led solutions rather than top-down controls – even as other global leaders rely on those tools to fight global warming.
Cryptocurrency and the carbon footprint
Cryptocurrency presents another contradiction in Musk’s climate profile. Musk is a high-profile crypto advocate – Tesla invested $1.5 billion in Bitcoin in 2021, and Musk’s tweets famously swung crypto markets. Yet he also publicly warned of crypto’s environmental costs. In May 2021, he announced that Tesla would pause accepting Bitcoin payments, explicitly citing climate concerns.
He wrote on Twitter that he was “concerned about rapidly increasing use of fossil fuels for Bitcoin mining,” especially coal, and insisted that “cryptocurrency… cannot come at great cost to the environment.” Tesla ultimately resumed allowing Bitcoin payments in 2023 once Bitcoin miners shifted toward greener energy, and it has embraced Dogecoin for some payments (Dogecoin’s mining is less intensive).
Critics argue that Musk’s crypto support conflicts with his green image. Bitcoin’s blockchain “mining” consumes enormous power worldwide – roughly 0.5% of global electricity. According to one analysis, Bitcoin mining emits 53-127 million metric tons of CO₂ annually, on par with a major country’s emissions.
This led some observers to call buying Teslas with Bitcoin a “hypocritical” move. Indeed, after Tesla’s Bitcoin purchase, a Washington Post column warned that using a carbon-intensive currency to buy an emissions-free car “doesn’t represent as much of a break from our polluting present as it seems.” Tesla has also sold most of its Bitcoin holdings by 2022, which Musk framed as a tax-related business decision, but skeptics view it as avoiding climate backlash.
In sum, Musk’s flirtation with crypto adds complexity to his approach to climate change. He has at times acknowledged the carbon footprint – and taken public steps (halting Bitcoin payments) in response – yet he remains one of crypto’s most influential boosters. Many environmentalists see this as a mixed legacy: promoting one high-tech future (digital currency) while simultaneously vilifying the very energy use it depends on.
Musk’s vision of a sustainable energy future
Musk envisions a sustainable future powered entirely by clean energy. His EV company reflects similar sentiments: “a world powered by solar energy, running on batteries, and transported by all-electric vehicles.” Musk believes sunlight and energy storage could meet nearly all human needs, even in remote regions. At a Paris summit, he likened the shift to how nations skipped landlines for mobile phones, arguing that solar panels and Tesla Powerwalls could let villages bypass fossil fuels altogether. He also advocates for a global, revenue-neutral carbon tax to accelerate the transition.
In his blueprint, every home generates solar power, every car is electric, and grid batteries replace fossil-fuel plants. Tesla’s Superchargers, Powerwalls, and the $100M XPrize for carbon removal all fit into this vision. He even explores futuristic ideas like orbital solar arrays beaming power to Earth, emphasizing that sustainable abundance through technology is essential before humanity reaches Mars.
Conclusion: a mixed environmental record
Musk’s public stance on climate change and actions on the environment contain contradictions. He catalyzed a shift toward electric cars and renewable power, yet he can seem cavalier about the consequences of rocket launches and crypto mining. He rails against fossil fuels in principle, but his companies have benefited from subsidies and he personally logs substantial carbon emissions.
This duality means observers can both praise and fault his record. Ultimately, Musk’s impact on climate change will likely be judged by the balance of the technologies he built (EVs, solar, batteries) versus the emissions from activities he championed (spaceflight, crypto) – a balance that continues to play out today.
How Pressfarm can help you achieve success with your brand
If you’re aiming for the stars like Elon Musk, your brand management can determine your success or failure. At Pressfarm, we help companies define the right narrative in the media for their brand – either to improve their credibility or resolve a PR crisis. If you are an entrepreneur wondering how to improve your company’s publicity, get in touch with us. We can help you craft and distribute your press releases, develop compelling guest posts and design eye-catching media kits for your brand.
Learn why we are good at what we do from our customer success stories.
