The process of founding a startup is an exciting but challenging journey, and it often begins with a group of like-minded individuals coming together to transform an idea into a viable business. In such collaborations, equity distribution among co-founders becomes a critical consideration.

Equity vesting is a strategy that addresses the issue of fairly distributing ownership while safeguarding the interests of all co-founders. This comprehensive FAQ guide will cover the concept of equity vesting, its benefits, common practices, and potential pitfalls.

Understanding equity vesting

What is equity vesting?

Equity vesting refers to the process of distributing ownership shares (equity) among co-founders over a predetermined period, typically subject to certain conditions. This is done to ensure that founders remain committed to the company and contribute their fair share of effort over time. Vesting schedules can be based on time (time-based vesting) or performance milestones (milestone-based vesting).

Why is equity vesting important?

Equity vesting is a strategic approach to distributing ownership shares in a company over time, often subject to specific conditions. This practice offers a range of benefits, especially in the context of startups and co-founder relationships. Here, we explore the key advantages of equity vesting.

  • Commitment and long-term alignment

One of the most significant advantages of equity vesting is its ability to promote commitment among co-founders. When equity is tied to a vesting schedule, co-founders have a strong incentive to remain actively involved in the business for the long term. This commitment is crucial for the success of any startup, as building a company often requires years of dedication.

Moreover, equity vesting fosters alignment of interests between co-founders and the company. With a vested interest in the business’s growth and profitability, co-founders are more likely to work towards shared goals and remain focused on the company’s success.

  • Protection against “free rider” co-founders

In some cases, co-founders may not contribute as much to the company’s success or may become less active over time. Without equity vesting, these co-founders could become “free riders” with undeserved ownership stakes. Equity vesting discourages this behavior by ensuring that co-founders must earn their equity through continued commitment and performance.

  • Alignment with startup milestones

In the early stages of a startup, it’s common for co-founders to work diligently without immediate financial rewards. Equity vesting aligns with the often lengthy journey of building a startup, as co-founders are willing to vest their equity over several years, mirroring the company’s growth trajectory.

This alignment between equity vesting and startup milestones helps keep co-founders motivated and focused on the company’s development, even during periods of uncertainty or slow growth.

  • Easier resolution of conflicts

Equity disputes can be a significant source of tension and conflict among co-founders. Equity vesting helps prevent these disputes by providing a clear framework for ownership distribution. Co-founders are less likely to argue over ownership shares when they understand that equity is earned over time or through specific achievements.

Furthermore, vesting schedules are typically outlined in founders’ agreements, which can include provisions for dispute resolution. This legal clarity can streamline conflict resolution processes and prevent disputes from escalating.

  • Investor and stakeholder confidence

Investors and stakeholders, including venture capitalists, angel investors, and potential acquirers, often look favorably upon equity vesting. It demonstrates that co-founders are committed to the long-term success of the company and that their interests are aligned with those of investors.

This alignment of interests can boost investor confidence, making it more likely for the startup to secure funding or partnerships. It also signals to potential acquirers that the co-founders are dedicated to the company’s future.

  • Protection against premature departures

Startup environments can be dynamic, and co-founder departures are not uncommon. Equity vesting acts as a protective mechanism for the company by ensuring that unvested shares revert to the business when a co-founder departs before completing their vesting schedule. This prevents the departing co-founder from retaining a significant stake in the company without fulfilling their commitment.

In essence, equity vesting safeguards the company’s interests in the event of a co-founder’s departure and helps maintain stability during transitions.

  • Fair distribution of ownership

Equity vesting ensures a fair distribution of ownership among co-founders. This fairness is particularly essential when co-founders have varying levels of contribution or different roles within the startup. Without equity vesting, early discrepancies in ownership could lead to disputes or resentment.

Equity vesting mitigates this risk by distributing ownership progressively, based on a predetermined schedule or milestones achieved. This ensures that co-founders who put in more effort or contribute significantly receive a larger share of the equity, thereby promoting a sense of fairness and equity within the founding team.

What are vesting conditions?

Vesting conditions are the criteria that must be met for co-founders to receive their equity. Common vesting conditions include time-based vesting (e.g., monthly or annually) or milestone-based vesting (e.g., achieving a certain revenue target). These conditions are usually outlined in a founders’ agreement or shareholders’ agreement.

What happens to unvested equity?

In the event of a co-founder’s departure or failure to meet vesting conditions, unvested equity typically reverts to the company’s ownership or is held in a pool for future allocation. This ensures that unearned equity does not become a source of contention or liability for the business.

Equity vesting structures

1) Time-based vesting:

  • What is time-based vesting?

Time-based vesting distributes equity over a specified period, typically with a one-year cliff period (a time threshold that must be reached before any equity vests), followed by monthly or quarterly vesting. For example, a co-founder might have a 4-year vesting schedule with a 1-year cliff, meaning they must wait one year before any equity vests, after which equity accrues incrementally over the subsequent three years.

  • What are the advantages of time-based vesting?

Time-based vesting is easy to implement. It is particularly effective for early-stage startups and co-founders who want to encourage long-term commitment.

  • What are the disadvantages of time-based vesting?

The main disadvantage is that it may not account for variations in co-founder contributions. Co-founders who put in more effort or have a more significant impact on the company’s success may feel unfairly treated under this structure.

2) Milestone-based vesting:

  • What is milestone-based vesting?

Milestone-based vesting links equity distribution to specific achievements or goals, such as product development milestones, revenue targets, or user acquisition goals. Co-founders earn equity when these milestones are met.

  • What are the advantages of milestone-based vesting?

Milestone-based vesting rewards co-founders for tangible contributions and accomplishments. This can be more equitable, especially in cases where co-founders have varying levels of responsibility.

  • What are the disadvantages of milestone-based vesting?

It can be complex to set and track milestones, and there might be disputes over whether certain milestones have been met. It may also require continuous adjustment of the vesting structure as the company’s goals evolve.

3) Hybrid vesting:

  • What is hybrid vesting?

Hybrid vesting combines elements of both time-based and milestone-based vesting. Co-founders vest a portion of their equity over time, and the remaining portion is tied to specific achievements. This structure offers flexibility and aligns with the unique dynamics of the startup.

  • When is hybrid vesting recommended?

Hybrid vesting can be a good choice when there are clear milestones but a desire to ensure ongoing commitment. It offers a compromise between the simplicity of time-based vesting and the performance-based nature of milestone-based vesting.

Implementing equity vesting

How to set up equity vesting:

  • What legal documents are needed for equity vesting?

Equity vesting is typically formalized through a founders’ agreement or a shareholders’ agreement. These documents specify the vesting schedule, vesting conditions, and the consequences of co-founder departures.

  • Should legal counsel be involved?

It’s advisable to consult with legal experts or an attorney when drafting these agreements to ensure they are legally sound and comprehensive. Legal advice can help prevent disputes and legal issues in the future.

Vesting schedules:

  • What are common vesting schedules?

Common vesting schedules include 4-year vesting with a 1-year cliff, 3-year vesting with a 1-year cliff, or even 2-year vesting without a cliff. The choice depends on the founders’ preferences and the specific needs of the startup.

  • Can vesting schedules be customized?

Yes, vesting schedules can be tailored to the unique circumstances of the startup and its co-founders. Some co-founders may negotiate for shorter or longer vesting periods based on their contributions and role within the company.

Handling vesting triggers:

  • What triggers vesting events?

Vesting events are typically triggered by the passage of time or the achievement of specific milestones or performance targets as outlined in the founders’ agreement.

  • How are vesting triggers tracked?

Vesting triggers are often tracked and recorded by the company’s legal or financial team. Automated equity management software can also be used to streamline this process.

Accelerated vesting:

  • What is accelerated vesting?

Accelerated vesting allows co-founders to gain full ownership of their equity before the predetermined schedule in specific situations, such as a change in control (e.g., acquisition) or a co-founder’s disability or death.

  • What are the considerations for accelerated vesting?

The conditions and terms for accelerated vesting should be clearly defined in the founders’ agreement. Co-founders should discuss and agree upon these terms in advance to avoid conflicts during unforeseen events.

How to handle common challenges and pitfalls

Founder departures:

  • What happens when a co-founder leaves the company prematurely?

When a co-founder leaves before fully vesting their equity, unvested shares typically return to the company. The departing co-founder may retain their vested shares. However, the specific outcome depends on the terms outlined in the co-founders’ agreement.

  • How can disputes be prevented in case of premature departure?

Outlining clear terms in the founders’ agreement regarding equity treatment in the event of departure can help prevent disputes. It is advisable to address exit scenarios comprehensively in the agreement.

Changing milestones:

  • What if milestones change over time?

In cases where milestone-based vesting is used, milestones may need to be adjusted as the company evolves. Co-founders should regularly communicate over these changes and update the founders’ agreement to reflect these changes.

Equity Dilution:

  • Can equity dilution occur even with vesting in place?

Yes, equity dilution can occur if the company issues additional equity, such as through funding rounds, without allocating some of it to the co-founders. Co-founders should be aware of the potential for dilution and have provisions in the founders’ agreement to address it.

Tax implications:

  • What are the tax implications of equity vesting?

Equity vesting, a common practice in startups and corporations, has significant tax implications for co-founders and employees who receive equity as part of their compensation. Understanding these tax implications is essential for both the recipients of equity and the companies granting it. In this discussion, we’ll briefly cover the tax consequences associated with equity vesting.

  • Taxation upon vesting

Equity that is subject to vesting conditions does not trigger a tax event at the time of grant. Instead, taxation is typically deferred until the equity vests. At the time of vesting, the co-founder or employee recognizes ordinary income based on the fair market value of the shares at that moment.

Income Tax: When equity vests, the recipient is liable for ordinary income tax on the value of the shares. This income is subject to federal and state income tax, Social Security and Medicare taxes, and any applicable local taxes.

Withholding: Companies may withhold a portion of the vested shares to cover the income tax liability. This practice is known as “sell to cover” and ensures that co-founders or employees do not need to look for the cash to pay the tax bill.

  • Transfer of equity

When co-founders or employees leave a company, they may need to consider the tax implications of transferring vested equity.

Capital gains tax upon sale or transfer: If the co-founder or employee sells or transfers their vested equity to another party, they may incur capital gains tax on any profit realized from the sale.

Gift tax considerations: If equity is transferred as a gift, there could be potential gift tax implications depending on the value of the shares and the recipient’s relationship to the giver.

  • Capital gains tax

Once equity is fully vested, the co-founder or employee becomes the owner of the shares, and the tax implications shift. When these shares are eventually sold or transferred, the tax treatment becomes subject to capital gains tax.

Long-term vs. short-term capital gains: The tax rate applied depends on the holding period of the shares. If the shares are held for more than one year, the gains are typically treated as long-term capital gains and enjoy preferential tax rates. Short-term capital gains, on the other hand, are taxed at the individual’s ordinary income tax rate.

Tax rate: Long-term capital gains are typically subject to a lower tax rate than the recipient’s ordinary income tax rate. The exact rate depends on the individual’s taxable income and filing status.


Equity vesting is a crucial aspect of the co-founder relationship in a startup. It ensures fairness, commitment, and alignment of interests while protecting the company from potential issues. While it might seem complex, with the right legal advice and open communication among co-founders, equity vesting can be a valuable tool for establishing a strong foundation for your startup. By understanding the nuances and addressing potential challenges, co-founders can navigate the journey of entrepreneurship with confidence and equity intact.

How Pressfarm can help you achieve success as a co-founder

In addition to developing a strategic equitty vesting strategy, your brand management can determine your success or failure. At Pressfarm, we help companies define the right narrative in the media for their brand – either to improve their credibility or resolve a PR crisis. If you are an entrepreneur wondering how to improve your company’s publicity, get in touch with us. We can help you craft and distribute your press releases, develop compelling guest posts, and design eye-catching media kits for your brand.

Learn why we are good at what we do from our customer success stories.